No wallets, accounts or names needed. File a sourced allegation anonymously. Everyone can inspect evidence, challenge a claim, and see what changed over time.
Read historical cases or file your own sourced claim without an account. A claim is never automatically treated as a fact.
No magical trust score. Just a public procedure: make a precise claim, attach inspectable material, challenge the reasoning, and keep every revision visible.
Put a specific, testable allegation on the record. Identify the subject and explain what's being asserted.
THE ALLEGATION ↗Submit source links or transaction hashes. Supported on-chain checks query Solana and Ethereum RPCs.
THE EVIDENCE ↗Others add counter-evidence, context and a public position. Votes measure opinion, never absolute truth.
THE DEBATE ↗The anonymous author can revise using a secret saved locally in that browser; prior versions remain visible.
THE RECORD ↗Proof Court deliberately separates three things that social feeds blur together: what someone alleges, what can actually be checked, and what people currently believe.
Evidence links remain public while the submitting person stays unnamed. A blockchain confirmation proves only what the chain records. The community's votes are displayed transparently, and every edit is preserved in the history.
$PROOF is the proposed community token identity around Proof Court — a home for the people who believe receipts should travel further than rumors.
The platform is open to everyone, with no wallet or token required. Token plans are separate from public evidence, and holding a token never turns an allegation into a fact.
Core token information stays blank until it can be checked against the actual token and on-chain records. No imaginary supply, liquidity, market cap or contract.
The internet already has enough opinions. It needs more context, transaction receipts, source documents and revision trails.
The proposed $PROOF identity is a way to rally around that mission. It is not a requirement to open, review or challenge a case — and it does not confer authority over what is true.
Here is the direction we are exploring for $PROOF and the surrounding Proof Court experience. This is a concept roadmap, not a claim that token work has been shipped or that launch milestones are guaranteed.
Platform: public docket, anonymous filing, source links and review tools are already available.
Token: contract and on-chain launch status have not been independently confirmed here.
Milestones are intentionally grouped by direction, not dates. Future phases are ideas, not guarantees; they can change as the product evolves.
Make crypto allegations easier to examine with public source links, historical reference cases, anonymous contributions and a visible record of changes.
If $PROOF launches, publish the verified mint address and clear information about supply, liquidity and how to independently check those details. No mysteries by design.
Experiment with featured explainers, curated source collections, weekly public case roundups and shareable evidence cards. All without changing the underlying facts.
Explore moderation tools, source-quality guidance, better resistance to coordinated voting and richer ways to show competing evidence side by side.
Consider open integrations, embeddable case cards and researcher-friendly tools. A world where a citation has a longer shelf life than a viral rumor.
These phases describe possible work, not completed token milestones, investment commitments, a promise of returns or a guaranteed schedule. Only verified contract and transaction information should be treated as token facts.